Back in May last year I wrote an editorial that suggested the politicians of this country hated SMSFs. At the time I came to this conclusion on the back of the new rules applying to limited recourse borrowing arrangements and how targeted they were to penalising this particular sector of the superannuation industry.

In the normal course of my job I have to attend just about every presentation regarding superannuation, whether it is specific to SMSFs or not.

In recent weeks we have witnessed a rather significant share market correction both in the United States and Australia. Naturally this is not a pleasant occurrence, but is sometimes a necessary phenomenon if markets are to be priced accurately. But the subsequent media coverage of these market falls always interests and frustrates me. Without fail […]

Ever since the Turnbull government handed down its bombshell superannuation reforms on 3 May 2016 as part of that year’s budget, we’ve all been hoping the implementation of some of the measures would end up a little less complicated than initial assessments had predicted.

The latest buzz in financial services circles in the past few weeks has been the announcement of a royal commission into the banks.

Well, what a surprise. After denial after denial the government finally acknowledged how unpopular its original proposed changes to the superannuation system were and eventually had to water them down.

When I began publishing selfmanagedsuper Trustee News, one of the missions I set myself was to cut through the unhelpful noise reverberating around the industry about the SMSF sector.

In the lead-up to December all the talk in the industry was about David Murray’s Financial System Inquiry and what the implications would be for SMSFs.

Many individuals establish an SMSF because they like the control and flexibility it gives them over their retirement savings.